Browse decisions and determinations
This database contains all public Decisions, Determinations, Orders and certain interim Decisions made by the Canadian Transportation Agency since 1988. Some decisions are confidential and are not published.
Sector
Ruling type
Date
- 2017 1 Apply 2017 filter
- 2016 4 Apply 2016 filter
- 2015 11 Apply 2015 filter
- 2014 7 Apply 2014 filter
- 2013 6 Apply 2013 filter
- 2012 2 Apply 2012 filter
- 2011 2 Apply 2011 filter
- 2010 3 Apply 2010 filter
- 2009 1 Apply 2009 filter
- 2008 2 Apply 2008 filter
- 2006 6 Apply 2006 filter
- 2004 1 Apply 2004 filter
- 2003 2 Apply 2003 filter
- 2002 8 Apply 2002 filter
- 2001 5 Apply 2001 filter
- 2000 5 Apply 2000 filter
- 1999 11 Apply 1999 filter
Showing 41-50 of 77 decisions.
This is further to the City of Oshawa's (the City) letter of June 5, 2006 in which the City requested that the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) stay the applications of the Canadian National Railway Company (CN) pending resolution of land title disputes and to the City's request of June...
LET-R-189-2006 | Letter Decision | 2006-07-13
Background
[1] On April 5, 2006, the Corporation of the City of Ottawa (hereinafter the City) filed the above-noted application with the Canadian Transportation Agency (hereinafter the Agency). An application pursuant to subsection 98(2) of the Canada Transportation Act (hereinafter the CTA)...
LET-R-188-2006 | Letter Decision | 2006-07-13
Background
This is further to your letter dated January 13, 2006 from Great Canadian Railtour Company Ltd. (GCRC) and letters dated January 16, 2006 from Canadian National Railway Company (CN) and Canadian Pacific Railway Company (CP) regarding the jurisdictional status of the GCRC pertaining to...
LET-R-178-2006 | Letter Decision | 2006-07-05
[1] This is further to the above-noted complaint and the subsequent motions for dismissal filed by both the Canadian National Railway Company (CN) and the BNSF Railway Company (BNSF).
A. Motions for dismissal
[2] In its letter dated April 7, 2006, CN requested that the Canadian Transportation...
LET-R-171-2006 | Letter Decision | 2006-06-30
Background
[1] On March 7, 2006, the Canadian Pacific Railway Company (CP) and the Canadian National Railway Company (CN) requested that the Agency adjust the volume-related composite price index in accordance with paragraph 151(4)(c) of the Canada Transportation Act (CTA) to reflect the...
LET-R-113-2006 | Letter Decision | 2006-04-27
[1] This is further to Wabush Mines Inc.'s (Wabush) requests for interim relief filed as part of its complaint for level of service of July 30, 2004 against Quebec North Shore and Labrador Railway Company Inc. (QNSL) in which Wabush is seeking:
an interim order requiring QNSL to continue to haul...
LET-R-248-2004 | Letter Decision | 2004-09-07
Further to the pre-consultation initiated with respect to the Railway Interswitching Regulations (the Regulations), the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) hereby solicits your comments on the proposed regulatory changes. At the time of the pre-consultation, the Agency pointed out that...
LET-R-228-2003 | Letter Decision | 2003-11-14
This is in reference to the application of the Canadian Pacific Railway Company (CP) dated December 21, 2001 wherein CP requested intervener status and filed preliminary objections with respect to the above-noted application.
CP submits that it has an interest in the proceedings and should be...
LET-R-1-2003 | Letter Decision | 2003-01-04
This letter is a follow-up to a recent telephone call that Mr. Bill Aird, the Agency's Senior Environmental Officer made to your office regarding the environmental assessment (EA) of the above noted project. The Agency requests that you indicate whether your organization has an interest in...
LET-R-280-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-09-27
On April 9 and 11, 2002 respectively, the Canadian National Railway Company (CN) and the Canadian Pacific Railway Company (CP) applied to the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) for a stay of all proceedings, including the proposed public hearing in respect of the above running rights...
LET-R-113-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-04-18