Decisions and determinations
This database contains all public Decisions, Determinations, Orders and certain interim Decisions made by the Canadian Transportation Agency since 1988. Some decisions are confidential and are not published.
Advanced search for decisions
Displaying 39601 - 39610 of 40426
| Decision | Decision number | Decision date |
|---|---|---|
|
INTRODUCTION
[1] On February 11, 2020, the SFC filed a notice of objection to amendments to the Great Lakes Pilotage Tariff Regulations, SOR/84-253 (Regulations)with the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency), pursuant to former subsection 34(2) of the Pilotage Act, RSC 1985, c...
|
CONF-10-2021 | 2021-11-04 |
|
SUMMARY
[1] This decision considers three issues.
[2] The first issue is whether CN breached its level of service obligations with respect to EMI’s traffic. The Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) finds that by not providing service to EMI at either RD-47 or [REDACTED], CN breached those...
|
CONF-11-2016 | 2016-08-26 |
|
SUMMARY
[1] Mr. Rosner filed an application with the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) against HBR alleging that HBR is in violation of its level of service obligations under the CTA because of the cessation of rail service on an HBR-owned railway line between Gillam and Churchill, Manitoba (...
|
CONF-11-2018 | 2018-06-13 |
|
SUMMARY
Normerica filed a complaint against CN with the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency), alleging that [REDACTED].
Normerica requests that the Agency grant it the following relief:
A determination pursuant to subsection 127(4) of the CTA, [REDACTED];
[REDACTED];
[REDACTED...
|
CONF-12-2018 | 2018-06-29 |
|
SUMMARY
[1] Geoff Mack filed an application with the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) pursuant to subsection 95.3(1) of the CTA concerning noise and vibration arising out of CP’s operations in Lambton Yard in Toronto, Ontario, at approximately mileage point 6.8 of CP’s Galt...
|
CONF-12-2021 | 2021-11-08 |
|
BACKGROUND
[1] The applicant filed two applications with the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency), one against United Airlines and one against Air Canada. The applications each allege that United Airlines and Air Canada, in operating their respective portions of the applicant’s return flights,...
|
CONF-14-2018 | 2018-09-14 |
|
SUMMARY
[1] Paterson requests that the Agency deem its facility located in Morris, Manitoba (Morris Terminal) to be within the interswitching limits of the CN and BNSF interchange at Emerson, Manitoba (Emerson Interchange).
[2] More specifically, Paterson is seeking that:
The Morris Terminal be...
|
CONF-15-2018 | 2018-10-02 |
|
SUMMARY
[1] On February 28, 2017, the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) issued Decision No. CONF-4-2017 (Decision). In the Decision, the Agency found that CP breached its level of service obligations to provide direct rail service to Univar except for the periods of July 10, 2014 until July...
|
CONF-17-2017 | 2017-12-20 |
|
SUMMARY
[1] RIL filed an application with the Agency for regulated and extended interswitching with respect to its elevators at Lamont and Westmor, Alberta.
[2] With respect to its Lamont elevator, RIL is seeking an order from the Agency:
determining that there is an interchange between the...
|
CONF-18-2018 | 2018-11-16 |
|
SUMMARY
[1] This Decision follows two others related to EMI’s July 29, 2015 application with the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) alleging that CN breached its level of service obligations, and deals with two issues:
Should the Agency, pursuant to paragraph 116(4)(c.1) of the CTA, order CN...
|
CONF-2-2017 | 2017-01-20 |