Decisions and determinations

""

 

This database contains all public Decisions, Determinations, Orders and certain interim Decisions made by the Canadian Transportation Agency since 1988. Some decisions are confidential and are not published.

Browse decisions

Advanced search for decisions

Displaying 39351 - 39360 of 39913
Decision Decision number Decision date
In accordance with subsection 151(1) of the Canada Transportation Act (CTA), the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) is required to determine the maximum revenue entitlement for the movement of grain in a crop year. One component of this formula is the calculation of the composite price index...
LET-R-23-2015 2015-04-09
In Determination No. R-2019-230 (Determination), the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) ordered the Canadian Pacific Railway Company (CP) and the Canadian National Railway Company (CN) to file additional data for the monitoring and computation of rates for regulated interswitching, no later...
LET-R-24-2020 2020-04-01
[1] This is further to Wabush Mines Inc.'s (Wabush) requests for interim relief filed as part of its complaint for level of service of July 30, 2004 against Quebec North Shore and Labrador Railway Company Inc. (QNSL) in which Wabush is seeking: an interim order requiring QNSL to continue to haul...
LET-R-248-2004 2004-09-07
Summary [1] RSR filed an application with the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) alleging that CN failed to: comply with its level of service obligations at an unnamed track running north from the Lulu Island spur line, east of the Number 5 Road in British Columbia (Subject Trackage);...
LET-R-25-2024 2024-05-23
The Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) acknowledges receipt of a letter addressed to Agency counsel dated October 13, 1999, from the Canadian National Railway Company (CN) concerning the upcoming deadline for a net salvage value determination in the above-captioned proceeding. CN proposes that...
LET-R-253-1999 1999-10-14
BACKGROUND [1] On March 16, 2022, the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) issued Decision LET‑R-13-2022, where it addressed claims for confidentiality made by both Vancouver and CP. [2] The Agency granted Vancouver’s claims for confidentiality with respect to land valuation information and...
LET-R-26-2022 2022-07-12
This is in reference to your letter dated July 24, 2000 in which you requested that the investigation officer assigned to the above-noted application be replaced by a new officer who was not involved in the original complaint. In support of your application, you submit that the reviewer did not do...
LET-R-265-2000 2000-09-12
By letter dated October 1, 1999, the Norfolk Southern Railway Company (hereinafter NS) applied pursuant to section 78 of the National Transportation Agency General Rules to have clauses 1 and 4 of Order No. 1999-R-308 and Decision No. 391-R-1999 of the Canadian Transportation Agency (hereinafter...
LET-R-267-1999 1999-10-25
INTRODUCTION [1] Elzear and Shirley O’Connor and Clarence-Michael Chaput (complainants) filed individual noise and vibration complaints with the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) against CSX Transportation Inc. (CSXT) concerning railway operations near Lake Street in Huntingdon, Quebec (...
LET-R-27-2013 2013-01-29
SUMMARY Staff of the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) received information on July 25, 2016 and August 15, 2016 from Moose Consortium Inc. (Moose) indicating that the City of Ottawa (City) had dismantled a section of the Ottawa River Line (ORL) approximately between mileage 0.62 and mileage...
LET-R-27-2017 2017-06-07