Decisions and determinations
This database contains all public Decisions, Determinations, Orders and certain interim Decisions made by the Canadian Transportation Agency since 1988. Some decisions are confidential and are not published.
Advanced search for decisions
Displaying 39901 - 39910 of 40596
| Decision | Decision number | Decision date |
|---|---|---|
|
On April 9 and 11, 2002 respectively, the Canadian National Railway Company (CN) and the Canadian Pacific Railway Company (CP) applied to the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) for a stay of all proceedings, including the proposed public hearing in respect of the above running rights...
|
LET-R-113-2002 | 2002-04-18 |
|
Background
[1] On March 7, 2006, the Canadian Pacific Railway Company (CP) and the Canadian National Railway Company (CN) requested that the Agency adjust the volume-related composite price index in accordance with paragraph 151(4)(c) of the Canada Transportation Act (CTA) to reflect the...
|
LET-R-113-2006 | 2006-04-27 |
|
This is in reference to Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) Decision No. LET-R-318-1998 dated December 17, 1998 wherein the Canadian National Railway Company (CN) was directed to provide the Agency with reasons supporting its motion of December 16, 1998.
On December 21, 1998, CN filed a...
|
LET-R-12-1999 | 1999-01-13 |
|
The Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) is in receipt of your letter dated January 14, 2019.
The Agency has already initiated an investigation on its own motion into possible freight rail service issues in the Vancouver area, pursuant to subsection 116 (1.11) of the Canada Transportation Act, S...
|
LET-R-12-2019 | 2019-01-14 |
|
On March 11, 1999, the Canadian National Railway Company (CN) filed a notice of application asking the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) to declare it has no authority to entertain the previously mentioned application.
CN concedes that section 101 of the Canada Transportation Act (CTA)...
|
LET-R-122-1999 | 1999-04-27 |
|
On December 7, 2000 the Federal Court of Appeal ruled that the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) did not, under existing legislation, have the jurisdiction to investigate and determine complaints relating to noise, smoke and vibrations emanating from the day-to-day operations of a federal...
|
LET-R-123-2001 | 2001-03-15 |
|
This is in reference to the above-noted application filed by the Ferroequus Railway Company Limited (FE) on February 20, 2001. In its application, FE requests three Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) orders. Firstly, FE asks the Agency for what may be termed a "running rights" order. That is,...
|
LET-R-127-2001 | 2001-03-16 |
|
This is in reference to the above-noted application filed by the Hudson Bay Railway Company (HBRC) on February 27, 2001. In its application, HBRC requests two Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) orders. First, HBRC asks the Agency for what may be termed a "running rights" order. That is, HBRC...
|
LET-R-128-2001 | 2001-03-16 |
|
In accordance with subsection 151(1) of the Canada Transportation Act (CTA), the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) is required to determine the maximum revenue entitlement for the movement of grain in a crop year. One component of this formula is the calculation of the composite price index,...
|
LET-R-13-2016 | 2016-04-13 |
|
BACKGROUND
[1] On October 5, 2018,Vancouver filed a written submission and supporting documents with respect to the net salvage value (NSV) of the Van Horne Spur and Industrial Lead, including a claim for confidentiality pertaining to certain information in the supporting documents...
|
LET-R-13-2022 | 2022-03-16 |