Decisions and determinations
This database contains all public Decisions, Determinations, Orders and certain interim Decisions made by the Canadian Transportation Agency since 1988. Some decisions are confidential and are not published.
Advanced search for decisions
Displaying 39921 - 39930 of 40596
| Decision | Decision number | Decision date |
|---|---|---|
|
In accordance with subsection 151(1) of the Canada Transportation Act (CTA), the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) is required to determine the maximum revenue entitlement for the movement of grain in a crop year. One component of this formula is the calculation of the composite price index,...
|
LET-R-17-2017 | 2017-04-26 |
|
BACKGROUND
On January 14, 2019, the Agency issued individual letter decisions to the following parties: the Canadian National Railway Company (CN), the Canadian Pacific Railway Company (CP), BNSF Railway (BNSF), the Forest Products Association of Canada (FPAC), the Canadian Oilseed Processors...
|
LET-R-17-2019 | 2019-01-21 |
|
Reference is made to the above-noted application filed by the Canadian National Railway Company (CN) which was received by the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) on February 24, 1999.
In accordance with subsection 29(1) of the Canada Transportation Act (CTA), the Agency shall make its...
|
LET-R-171-1999 | 1999-06-23 |
|
[1] This is further to the above-noted complaint and the subsequent motions for dismissal filed by both the Canadian National Railway Company (CN) and the BNSF Railway Company (BNSF).
A. Motions for dismissal
[2] In its letter dated April 7, 2006, CN requested that the Canadian Transportation...
|
LET-R-171-2006 | 2006-06-30 |
|
By letter dated May 24, 2000, the Algoma Central Railway Inc. (ACRI) applied, pursuant to section 78 of the National Transportation Agency General Rules, to have Order No. 2000-R-102 and Decision No. 233-R-2000 of the Agency dated March 31st, 2000 stayed pending the disposition of the appeals...
|
LET-R-174-2000 | 2000-06-14 |
|
This will acknowledge receipt of CN's letter dated June 12, 2000, requesting an extension to respond to decision No. LET-R-161-2000 dated June 2, 2000, and to restore the process outlined in that letter, in regard to the above-noted complaint.
In regard to CN's statement that the Canadian...
|
LET-R-175-2000 | 2000-06-16 |
|
The Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency), on June 21, 1999, received the Canadian National Railway Company's (CN) completed application pursuant to the provisions of section 98 of the Canada Transportation Act. Also provided in support of its application was an environmental impact...
|
LET-R-176-1999 | 1999-06-25 |
|
Background
This is further to your letter dated January 13, 2006 from Great Canadian Railtour Company Ltd. (GCRC) and letters dated January 16, 2006 from Canadian National Railway Company (CN) and Canadian Pacific Railway Company (CP) regarding the jurisdictional status of the GCRC pertaining to...
|
LET-R-178-2006 | 2006-07-05 |
|
Summary
[1] The Agency has decided to conduct an extended round of consultations with industry stakeholders, including CN and CPKC, to seek additional comments before determining which forecasting approaches will be most appropriate for use in future determinations beginning with the 2027-2028...
|
LET-R-18-2026 | 2026-04-17 |
|
Canadian National Railway Company The Fontainebleu Train Noise Committee
This refers to CN's letter dated June 20, 2000, in regard to the above-noted matter.
In the absence of a mediation agreement, the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) must proceed with the formal adjudicative process. This...
|
LET-R-183-2000 | 2000-06-23 |