Decisions and determinations
This database contains all public Decisions, Determinations, Orders and certain interim Decisions made by the Canadian Transportation Agency since 1988. Some decisions are confidential and are not published.
Advanced search for decisions
Displaying 38261 - 38270 of 38709
| Decision | Decision number | Decision date |
|---|---|---|
|
The Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) acknowledges receipt of a letter addressed to Agency counsel dated October 13, 1999, from the Canadian National Railway Company (CN) concerning the upcoming deadline for a net salvage value determination in the above-captioned proceeding.
CN proposes that...
|
LET-R-253-1999 | 1999-10-14 |
|
This is in reference to your letter dated July 24, 2000 in which you requested that the investigation officer assigned to the above-noted application be replaced by a new officer who was not involved in the original complaint. In support of your application, you submit that the reviewer did not do...
|
LET-R-265-2000 | 2000-09-12 |
|
By letter dated October 1, 1999, the Norfolk Southern Railway Company (hereinafter NS) applied pursuant to section 78 of the National Transportation Agency General Rules to have clauses 1 and 4 of Order No. 1999-R-308 and Decision No. 391-R-1999 of the Canadian Transportation Agency (hereinafter...
|
LET-R-267-1999 | 1999-10-25 |
|
INTRODUCTION
[1] Elzear and Shirley O’Connor and Clarence-Michael Chaput (complainants) filed individual noise and vibration complaints with the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) against CSX Transportation Inc. (CSXT) concerning railway operations near Lake Street in Huntingdon, Quebec (...
|
LET-R-27-2013 | 2013-01-29 |
|
SUMMARY
Staff of the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) received information on July 25, 2016 and August 15, 2016 from Moose Consortium Inc. (Moose) indicating that the City of Ottawa (City) had dismantled a section of the Ottawa River Line (ORL) approximately between mileage 0.62 and mileage...
|
LET-R-27-2017 | 2017-06-07 |
|
In accordance with subsection 151(1) of the Canada Transportation Act (CTA), the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) is required to determine the maximum revenue entitlement for the movement of grain in a crop year. One component of this formula is the calculation of the composite price index,...
|
LET-R-27-2018 | 2018-04-23 |
|
The Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) has examined the letters dated October 29, 1999 filed by the Canadian Pacific Railway Company (CP) and the Canadian National Railway Company (CN) requesting, in part, that the Agency exclude certain witness and intervener
statements filed in the above-...
|
LET-R-278-1999 | 1999-11-04 |
|
In respect of the motion of the Canadian Pacific Railway Company (CP) dated December 30, 1998 requesting that the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) stay all proceedings in the above-noted matter pending the outcome of litigation outstanding before the Quebec Superior Court, the Agency has...
|
LET-R-28-1999 | 1999-02-01 |
|
INTRODUCTION
[1]
On March 23, 2015, the Canadian National Railway Company (CN) filed its Project Description of a Designated Project (Project Description) for its Milton Logistics Hub Project (project) with the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEA Agency) pursuant to the requirements of...
|
LET-R-28-2015 | 2015-05-01 |
|
In accordance with subsection 151(1) of the Canada Transportation Act (CTA), the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) is required to determine the maximum revenue entitlement for the movement of grain in a crop year. One component of this formula is the calculation of the composite price index...
|
LET-R-28-2018 | 2018-04-23 |