Decisions and determinations
This database contains all public Decisions, Determinations, Orders and certain interim Decisions made by the Canadian Transportation Agency since 1988. Some decisions are confidential and are not published.
Advanced search for decisions
Displaying 39571 - 39580 of 40271
| Decision | Decision number | Decision date |
|---|---|---|
|
SUMMARY
[1] The applicant, accompanied by an Emotional Support Animal (ESA), was told to disembark the aircraft when Porter identified the ESA’s behaviour as posing a safety risk. The applicant filed an application with the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) against Porter pursuant to:...
|
LET-AT-C-A-67-2019 | 2019-10-01 |
|
Summary
[1] The applicant filed an application with the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) against the respondents regarding their refusal to accommodate her by transporting her ESA in the cabin for travel to London, United Kingdom (UK).
[2] The applicant submits that she needs to travel...
|
LET-AT-C-A-7-2024 | 2024-02-20 |
|
In its Decision No. LET-AT-R-5-2002 dated January 8, 2002, the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) indicated that it would issue directions establishing the time frames for the filing of further submissions by the Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) and VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA), as...
|
LET-AT-R-11-2002 | 2002-01-16 |
|
By letter dated May 26, 2003, VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA) responded to the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency)'s direction to show cause contained in Agency Decision No. 175-AT-R-2003 dated March 27, 2003. This submission continues to be under consideration by the Agency.
The Agency has, in the...
|
LET-AT-R-128-2003 | 2003-05-30 |
|
The Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency), in Decision No. 175-AT-R-2003 dated March 27, 2003, set out the preliminary findings of the Agency that fourteen obstacles found in VIA Rail Canada Inc.'s (VIA) Renaissance passenger rail cars are undue, including several obstacles related to the space...
|
LET-AT-R-130-2003 | 2003-06-09 |
|
The Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) has received your letter of February 22, 2001 and has carefully considered the submissions made therein. VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA) has argued the position that the Agency does not have the jurisdiction to proceed with the new inquiry with respect to...
|
LET-AT-R-146-2001 | 2001-03-21 |
|
In order to conduct its inquiry into whether the tariff constitutes an obstacle and, if so, whether the obstacle is undue, the Agency requires information and evidence. In particular, the Agency requires a complete and detailed response from VIA to the issues identified in the Agency Decision No....
|
LET-AT-R-147-2001 | 2001-03-21 |
|
This is further to Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) Decision No. LET-AT-R-130-2003, dated June 9, 2003, wherein the Agency stated that it was of the opinion that VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA), in its May 26th, 2003 response to the Agency's direction to show cause contained at pages 145 and 146...
|
LET-AT-R-149-2003 | 2003-07-04 |
|
By letter dated December 4, 2000, the Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) filed an application with the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) for interim relief pursuant to subsections 27(1) and 28(2) of the Canada Transportation Act (CTA), and for a final order pursuant to section 172...
|
LET-AT-R-176-2001 | 2001-04-03 |
|
Background
In Decision No. 479-AT-R-2002 dated August 28, 2002 (the Decision), the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) made a determination with respect to an application filed by Jean Lemonde, on behalf of Minikami (Club de mini Basket-ball en fauteuil roulant "Les Kamikazes"), and ordered...
|
LET-AT-R-200-2003 | 2003-09-30 |