Decisions and determinations
This database contains all public Decisions, Determinations, Orders and certain interim Decisions made by the Canadian Transportation Agency since 1988. Some decisions are confidential and are not published.
Advanced search for decisions
Displaying 39701 - 39710 of 40337
| Decision | Decision number | Decision date |
|---|---|---|
|
[1] This is further to the above-noted complaint and the subsequent motions for dismissal filed by both the Canadian National Railway Company (CN) and the BNSF Railway Company (BNSF).
A. Motions for dismissal
[2] In its letter dated April 7, 2006, CN requested that the Canadian Transportation...
|
LET-R-171-2006 | 2006-06-30 |
|
By letter dated May 24, 2000, the Algoma Central Railway Inc. (ACRI) applied, pursuant to section 78 of the National Transportation Agency General Rules, to have Order No. 2000-R-102 and Decision No. 233-R-2000 of the Agency dated March 31st, 2000 stayed pending the disposition of the appeals...
|
LET-R-174-2000 | 2000-06-14 |
|
This will acknowledge receipt of CN's letter dated June 12, 2000, requesting an extension to respond to decision No. LET-R-161-2000 dated June 2, 2000, and to restore the process outlined in that letter, in regard to the above-noted complaint.
In regard to CN's statement that the Canadian...
|
LET-R-175-2000 | 2000-06-16 |
|
The Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency), on June 21, 1999, received the Canadian National Railway Company's (CN) completed application pursuant to the provisions of section 98 of the Canada Transportation Act. Also provided in support of its application was an environmental impact...
|
LET-R-176-1999 | 1999-06-25 |
|
Background
This is further to your letter dated January 13, 2006 from Great Canadian Railtour Company Ltd. (GCRC) and letters dated January 16, 2006 from Canadian National Railway Company (CN) and Canadian Pacific Railway Company (CP) regarding the jurisdictional status of the GCRC pertaining to...
|
LET-R-178-2006 | 2006-07-05 |
|
Canadian National Railway Company The Fontainebleu Train Noise Committee
This refers to CN's letter dated June 20, 2000, in regard to the above-noted matter.
In the absence of a mediation agreement, the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) must proceed with the formal adjudicative process. This...
|
LET-R-183-2000 | 2000-06-23 |
|
I. Introduction
Cost of capital is defined as the total return on net investment that is required by shareholders and debt holders so that debt costs can be paid and equity investors can be provided with an adequate return on investment consistent with the risks assumed for the period under...
|
LET-R-185-2010 | 2010-11-04 |
|
Subsection 151(1) of the Canada Transportation Act (CTA) requires that the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) determine the amount of the maximum revenue entitlement for the movement of grain in a crop year. This process includes Agency determinations regarding appropriate cost of...
|
LET-R-187-2012 | 2012-12-18 |
|
Background
[1] On April 5, 2006, the Corporation of the City of Ottawa (hereinafter the City) filed the above-noted application with the Canadian Transportation Agency (hereinafter the Agency). An application pursuant to subsection 98(2) of the Canada Transportation Act (hereinafter the CTA)...
|
LET-R-188-2006 | 2006-07-13 |
|
This is further to the City of Oshawa's (the City) letter of June 5, 2006 in which the City requested that the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) stay the applications of the Canadian National Railway Company (CN) pending resolution of land title disputes and to the City's request of June...
|
LET-R-189-2006 | 2006-07-13 |