Browse decisions and determinations
This database contains all public Decisions, Determinations, Orders and certain interim Decisions made by the Canadian Transportation Agency since 1988. Some decisions are confidential and are not published.
Ruling type
Date
- 2017 1 Apply 2017 filter
- 2016 5 Apply 2016 filter
- 2015 11 Apply 2015 filter
- 2014 7 Apply 2014 filter
- 2013 6 Apply 2013 filter
- 2012 3 Apply 2012 filter
- 2011 2 Apply 2011 filter
- 2010 4 Apply 2010 filter
- 2009 1 Apply 2009 filter
- 2008 2 Apply 2008 filter
- 2006 7 Apply 2006 filter
- 2005 2 Apply 2005 filter
- 2004 2 Apply 2004 filter
- 2003 6 Apply 2003 filter
- 2002 10 Apply 2002 filter
- 2001 10 Apply 2001 filter
- 2000 10 Apply 2000 filter
- 1999 14 Apply 1999 filter
Showing 71-80 of 103 decisions.
Reference is made to Canada 3000 Airlines Limited's (hereinafter Canada 3000) facsimile letter dated September 24, 2001 notifying the Canadian Transportation Agency (hereinafter the Agency) of Canada 3000's intention to implement a $2.00 Cdn Insurance Surcharge per sector effective October 1, 2001...
LET-A-410-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-09-28
Reference is made to Trillium Railway Company Limited's solicitors (Trillium) correspondences dated December 27, 2000 and March 5, 2001 and to the City of Welland (the City) response dated March 20, 2001 with respect to the enforcement of Canadian Transportation Agency Order No. 2000-AGR-42.
On...
LET-R-214-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-04-30
On April 4, 2001, by Decision No. LET-W-182-2001, the Agency ordered the Pacific Pilotage Authority (PPA) to produce and file with the Agency, no later than 5 p.m. PST on April 4, 2001, copies of "... documents evidencing the agreement of the parties on issues negotiated in advance of the final...
LET-W-190-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-04-06
By Decision No. LET-W-163-2001, the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) directed the Pacific Pilotage Authority (PPA) to file a copy of its new contract with the British Columbia Coast Pilots Ltd. (BCCP)covering the year 2001 no later than April 3, 2001.
By letter dated March 29, 2001, the...
LET-W-182-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-04-04
On February 5, 2001,the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency), pursuant to section 18 of the National Transportation Agency General Rules, SOR/88-23 (the General Rules), ordered the Pacific Pilotage Authority (PPA) to produce and file with the Agency, amongst other things, copies of service...
LET-W-174-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-04-02
In response to LET-W-47-2001, the production order issued by the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) on February 5, 2001 in the above matter, the Pacific Pilotage Authority (the Authority) filed with the Agency a service contract with subsequent amendments between the Authority and the...
LET-W-138-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-03-19
This is in reference to the above-noted application filed by the Hudson Bay Railway Company (HBRC) on February 27, 2001. In its application, HBRC requests two Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) orders. First, HBRC asks the Agency for what may be termed a "running rights" order. That is, HBRC...
LET-R-128-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-03-16
This is in reference to the above-noted application filed by the Ferroequus Railway Company Limited (FE) on February 20, 2001. In its application, FE requests three Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) orders. Firstly, FE asks the Agency for what may be termed a "running rights" order. That is,...
LET-R-127-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-03-16
On December 7, 2000 the Federal Court of Appeal ruled that the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) did not, under existing legislation, have the jurisdiction to investigate and determine complaints relating to noise, smoke and vibrations emanating from the day-to-day operations of a federal...
LET-R-123-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-03-15
This is in reference to your letter dated July 24, 2000 in which you requested that the investigation officer assigned to the above-noted application be replaced by a new officer who was not involved in the original complaint. In support of your application, you submit that the reviewer did not do...
LET-R-265-2000 | Letter Decision | 2000-09-12