Browse decisions and determinations
This database contains all public Decisions, Determinations, Orders and certain interim Decisions made by the Canadian Transportation Agency since 1988. Some decisions are confidential and are not published.
Sector
Ruling type
Date
Showing 1-10 of 12 decisions.
By letter dated April 16, 2002, the parties were advised that the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) would now consider Mr. Suthons' application.
As you are aware, in its Decision No.646-AT-A-2001 dated December 12, 2001, the Agency concluded that obesity, per se, is not a disability for the...
LET-AT-A-375-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-12-31
By Decision No. LET-AT-R-300-2002 dated October 11, 2002, the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) provided the Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) and VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA) with a copy of a report prepared by the Agency's engineer, André Paquette, P. Eng., entitled Draft Report:...
LET-AT-R-358-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-12-10
In its Decision No. LET-AT-R-300-2002 dated October 11, 2002, the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) provided the Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) and VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA) with a copy of a report prepared by the Agency's engineer, André Paquette, P. Eng., entitled Draft...
LET-AT-R-339-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-11-22
Pursuant to Decision No. LET-AT-R-232-2002, dated August 14, 2002, the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) determined that it was necessary to conduct a second technical inspection of the Renaissance cars in order to confirm changes made by VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA) to the dimensions of some...
LET-AT-R-250-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-08-29
By letter dated August 16, 2002, the Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) filed a request for inter alia an interim injunction to prevent VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA) from further changing or modifying, or contracting in any way for further changes or modifications, of the Renaissance trains...
LET-AT-R-235-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-08-20
By Decision No. LET-AT-R-200-2002 dated July 22, 2002, VIA Rail Canada Inc.'s (VIA) was to confirm the accuracy of certain measurements with respect to the washroom of the "accessible suite". By letter dated July 29, 2002, VIA advised the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) that the...
LET-AT-R-232-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-08-14
By letter dated January 30, 2002, received on January 31, 2002, the Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) filed its submission, with attachments to follow, in response to Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) Decision No. LET-AT-R-11-2002 dated January 16, 2002. Although this submission...
LET-AT-R-36-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-02-01
On May 14, 2001, Miriam Gallacher on behalf of Laura Patton filed, pursuant to subsection 172(1) of the Canada Transportation Act, S.C., 1996, c. 10, an application with the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) regarding Royal Aviation Inc. (Royal). Subsequently, Royal was purchased by the...
LET-AT-A-23-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-01-25
In its letter dated December 20, 2001, the Council for Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) sought intervener status in the above-noted application. In its Decision No. LET-AT-A-495-2001 dated December 27, 2001, the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) acknowledged receipt of CCD's application and...
LET-AT-A-21-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-01-23
In its Decision No. LET-AT-R-5-2002 dated January 8, 2002, the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) indicated that it would issue directions establishing the time frames for the filing of further submissions by the Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) and VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA), as...
LET-AT-R-11-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-01-16