Browse decisions and determinations
This database contains all public Decisions, Determinations, Orders and certain interim Decisions made by the Canadian Transportation Agency since 1988. Some decisions are confidential and are not published.
Sector
Date
Showing 41-49 of 49 decisions.
February 8, 2002
APPLICATION by Air Canada pursuant to section 32 of the Canada Transportation Act, S.C., 1996, c. 10, for a review of Decision No. 670-AT-A-2001 dated December 27, 2001.
File No. U3570/99-68
APPLICATION
On January 18, 2002, Air Canada requested that the Canadian Transportation...
66-AT-A-2002 | Decision | 2002-02-08
By letter dated January 30, 2002, received on January 31, 2002, the Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) filed its submission, with attachments to follow, in response to Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) Decision No. LET-AT-R-11-2002 dated January 16, 2002. Although this submission...
LET-AT-R-36-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-02-01
January 31, 2002
APPLICATION by Alain Horchower pursuant to subsections 172(1) and (3) of the Canada Transportation Act, S.C., 1996, c. 10, concerning the difficulties he experienced with Air Transat A.T. Inc. carrying on business as Air Transat on Flight No. TS914 between Calgary, Alberta, Canada...
56-AT-A-2002 | Decision | 2002-01-31
January 28, 2002
APPLICATION by Elliott Richman, pursuant to subsection 172(1) of the Canada Transportation Act, S.C., 1996, c. 10, concerning the absence of TTY (telephone-teletype devices for persons who are deaf or hard of hearing) pay telephones in seven VIA Rail Canada Inc. stations, namely...
47-AT-R-2002 | Decision | 2002-01-28
On May 14, 2001, Miriam Gallacher on behalf of Laura Patton filed, pursuant to subsection 172(1) of the Canada Transportation Act, S.C., 1996, c. 10, an application with the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) regarding Royal Aviation Inc. (Royal). Subsequently, Royal was purchased by the...
LET-AT-A-23-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-01-25
In its letter dated December 20, 2001, the Council for Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) sought intervener status in the above-noted application. In its Decision No. LET-AT-A-495-2001 dated December 27, 2001, the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) acknowledged receipt of CCD's application and...
LET-AT-A-21-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-01-23
In its Decision No. LET-AT-R-5-2002 dated January 8, 2002, the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) indicated that it would issue directions establishing the time frames for the filing of further submissions by the Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) and VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA), as...
LET-AT-R-11-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-01-16
The Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) by letter dated November 1, 2001, requests that the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) issue an order for the production of the Alstom and Bombardier contracts which are in the possession of VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA). In Agency Decision No...
LET-AT-R-6-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-01-08
By letter dated November 15, 2001, the Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) addressed 45 interrogatories to VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA), which it copied to the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency). By letter dated November 30, 2001, VIA filed its responses including reasons as to why...
LET-AT-R-5-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-01-08