Decisions and determinations
This database contains all public Decisions, Determinations, Orders and certain interim Decisions made by the Canadian Transportation Agency since 1988. Some decisions are confidential and are not published.
Advanced search for decisions
Displaying 38171 - 38180 of 38709
| Decision | Decision number | Decision date |
|---|---|---|
|
By letter dated May 26, 2003, VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA) responded to the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency)'s direction to show cause contained in Agency Decision No. 175-AT-R-2003 dated March 27, 2003. This submission continues to be under consideration by the Agency.
The Agency has, in the...
|
LET-AT-R-128-2003 | 2003-05-30 |
|
The Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency), in Decision No. 175-AT-R-2003 dated March 27, 2003, set out the preliminary findings of the Agency that fourteen obstacles found in VIA Rail Canada Inc.'s (VIA) Renaissance passenger rail cars are undue, including several obstacles related to the space...
|
LET-AT-R-130-2003 | 2003-06-09 |
|
The Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) has received your letter of February 22, 2001 and has carefully considered the submissions made therein. VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA) has argued the position that the Agency does not have the jurisdiction to proceed with the new inquiry with respect to...
|
LET-AT-R-146-2001 | 2001-03-21 |
|
In order to conduct its inquiry into whether the tariff constitutes an obstacle and, if so, whether the obstacle is undue, the Agency requires information and evidence. In particular, the Agency requires a complete and detailed response from VIA to the issues identified in the Agency Decision No....
|
LET-AT-R-147-2001 | 2001-03-21 |
|
This is further to Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) Decision No. LET-AT-R-130-2003, dated June 9, 2003, wherein the Agency stated that it was of the opinion that VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA), in its May 26th, 2003 response to the Agency's direction to show cause contained at pages 145 and 146...
|
LET-AT-R-149-2003 | 2003-07-04 |
|
By letter dated December 4, 2000, the Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) filed an application with the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) for interim relief pursuant to subsections 27(1) and 28(2) of the Canada Transportation Act (CTA), and for a final order pursuant to section 172...
|
LET-AT-R-176-2001 | 2001-04-03 |
|
Background
In Decision No. 479-AT-R-2002 dated August 28, 2002 (the Decision), the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) made a determination with respect to an application filed by Jean Lemonde, on behalf of Minikami (Club de mini Basket-ball en fauteuil roulant "Les Kamikazes"), and ordered...
|
LET-AT-R-200-2003 | 2003-09-30 |
|
By Decision No. LET-AT-R-200-2002 dated July 22, 2002, VIA Rail Canada Inc.'s (VIA) was to confirm the accuracy of certain measurements with respect to the washroom of the "accessible suite". By letter dated July 29, 2002, VIA advised the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) that the...
|
LET-AT-R-232-2002 | 2002-08-14 |
|
By letter dated August 16, 2002, the Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) filed a request for inter alia an interim injunction to prevent VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA) from further changing or modifying, or contracting in any way for further changes or modifications, of the Renaissance trains...
|
LET-AT-R-235-2002 | 2002-08-20 |
|
Pursuant to Decision No. LET-AT-R-232-2002, dated August 14, 2002, the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) determined that it was necessary to conduct a second technical inspection of the Renaissance cars in order to confirm changes made by VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA) to the dimensions of some...
|
LET-AT-R-250-2002 | 2002-08-29 |