Decisions and determinations
This database contains all public Decisions, Determinations, Orders and certain interim Decisions made by the Canadian Transportation Agency since 1988. Some decisions are confidential and are not published.
Advanced search for decisions
Displaying 38231 - 38240 of 38722
| Decision | Decision number | Decision date |
|---|---|---|
|
On December 7, 2000 the Federal Court of Appeal ruled that the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) did not, under existing legislation, have the jurisdiction to investigate and determine complaints relating to noise, smoke and vibrations emanating from the day-to-day operations of a federal...
|
LET-R-123-2001 | 2001-03-15 |
|
This is in reference to the above-noted application filed by the Ferroequus Railway Company Limited (FE) on February 20, 2001. In its application, FE requests three Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) orders. Firstly, FE asks the Agency for what may be termed a "running rights" order. That is,...
|
LET-R-127-2001 | 2001-03-16 |
|
This is in reference to the above-noted application filed by the Hudson Bay Railway Company (HBRC) on February 27, 2001. In its application, HBRC requests two Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) orders. First, HBRC asks the Agency for what may be termed a "running rights" order. That is, HBRC...
|
LET-R-128-2001 | 2001-03-16 |
|
In accordance with subsection 151(1) of the Canada Transportation Act (CTA), the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) is required to determine the maximum revenue entitlement for the movement of grain in a crop year. One component of this formula is the calculation of the composite price index,...
|
LET-R-13-2016 | 2016-04-13 |
|
In accordance with subsection 151(1) of the Canada Transportation Act (CTA), the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) is required to determine the maximum revenue entitlement for the movement of grain in a crop year. One component of this formula is the calculation of the composite price index,...
|
LET-R-14-2016 | 2016-04-13 |
|
On October 13, 2011 Russel Metals Inc. (Russel) filed a complaint against the Canadian Pacific Railway Company (CP) pursuant to section 120.1 of the Canada Transportation Act (CTA), with respect to the legality of certain provisions of CP’s Tarff 2, “Railcar Supplemental Services.” Specifically...
|
LET-R-144-2012 | 2012-09-26 |
|
This refers to the letter of the Canadian Pacific Railway Company (CP) dated May 25, 2000, in which CP requests the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) to issue an order urgently with respect to the Canadian National Railway Company (CN) requiring it to remove the cement blocks preventing...
|
LET-R-146-2000 | 2000-05-26 |
|
INTRODUCTION AND ISSUE
Complaint
On August 8, 2011, Jen Bysterveld filed a complaint with the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) on behalf of Sonja Bogdanovska, Liv Kolbe, Lara Murphy, Carolyn Fewer, Jen Woods, Sandy MacIsaac, Karen Marcus, Ian McNichol, Nancy McNichol and Bill Bakelaar...
|
LET-R-148-2012 | 2012-10-05 |
|
INTRODUCTION
[1] On October 17, 2014, LDC filed a level of service application against CN requesting the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) to make an order determining that CN has failed to fulfill its level of service obligations under sections 113 to 115 of the Canada Transportation Act (...
|
LET-R-15-2015 | 2015-03-20 |
|
Introduction and issue
Complaint
On June 9, 2009, the West Toronto Diamond Community Group (WTDCG) filed a complaint with the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) pursuant to section 95.3 of the Canada Transportation Act (CTA) against "GO Transit's Joint Venture with Canadian National" regarding...
|
LET-R-151-2009 | 2009-10-08 |