Browse decisions and determinations
This database contains all public Decisions, Determinations, Orders and certain interim Decisions made by the Canadian Transportation Agency since 1988. Some decisions are confidential and are not published.
Ruling type
Date
- 2024 1 Apply 2024 filter
- 2023 5 Apply 2023 filter
- 2022 9 Apply 2022 filter
- 2021 5 Apply 2021 filter
- 2020 6 Apply 2020 filter
- 2019 17 Apply 2019 filter
- 2018 7 Apply 2018 filter
- 2017 9 Apply 2017 filter
- 2016 6 Apply 2016 filter
- 2015 13 Apply 2015 filter
- 2014 9 Apply 2014 filter
- 2013 8 Apply 2013 filter
- 2012 5 Apply 2012 filter
- 2011 4 Apply 2011 filter
- 2010 5 Apply 2010 filter
- 2009 3 Apply 2009 filter
- 2008 2 Apply 2008 filter
- 2006 6 Apply 2006 filter
- 2004 1 Apply 2004 filter
- 2003 6 Apply 2003 filter
- 2002 16 Apply 2002 filter
- 2001 13 Apply 2001 filter
- 2000 5 Apply 2000 filter
- 1999 11 Apply 1999 filter
Showing 121-130 of 172 decisions.
[1] This is further to Wabush Mines Inc.'s (Wabush) requests for interim relief filed as part of its complaint for level of service of July 30, 2004 against Quebec North Shore and Labrador Railway Company Inc. (QNSL) in which Wabush is seeking:
an interim order requiring QNSL to continue to haul...
LET-R-248-2004 | Letter Decision | 2004-09-07
Further to the pre-consultation initiated with respect to the Railway Interswitching Regulations (the Regulations), the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) hereby solicits your comments on the proposed regulatory changes. At the time of the pre-consultation, the Agency pointed out that...
LET-R-228-2003 | Letter Decision | 2003-11-14
Background
In Decision No. 479-AT-R-2002 dated August 28, 2002 (the Decision), the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) made a determination with respect to an application filed by Jean Lemonde, on behalf of Minikami (Club de mini Basket-ball en fauteuil roulant "Les Kamikazes"), and ordered...
LET-AT-R-200-2003 | Letter Decision | 2003-09-30
This is further to Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) Decision No. LET-AT-R-130-2003, dated June 9, 2003, wherein the Agency stated that it was of the opinion that VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA), in its May 26th, 2003 response to the Agency's direction to show cause contained at pages 145 and 146...
LET-AT-R-149-2003 | Letter Decision | 2003-07-04
The Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency), in Decision No. 175-AT-R-2003 dated March 27, 2003, set out the preliminary findings of the Agency that fourteen obstacles found in VIA Rail Canada Inc.'s (VIA) Renaissance passenger rail cars are undue, including several obstacles related to the space...
LET-AT-R-130-2003 | Letter Decision | 2003-06-09
By letter dated May 26, 2003, VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA) responded to the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency)'s direction to show cause contained in Agency Decision No. 175-AT-R-2003 dated March 27, 2003. This submission continues to be under consideration by the Agency.
The Agency has, in the...
LET-AT-R-128-2003 | Letter Decision | 2003-05-30
This is in reference to the application of the Canadian Pacific Railway Company (CP) dated December 21, 2001 wherein CP requested intervener status and filed preliminary objections with respect to the above-noted application.
CP submits that it has an interest in the proceedings and should be...
LET-R-1-2003 | Letter Decision | 2003-01-04
By Decision No. LET-AT-R-300-2002 dated October 11, 2002, the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) provided the Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) and VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA) with a copy of a report prepared by the Agency's engineer, André Paquette, P. Eng., entitled Draft Report:...
LET-AT-R-358-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-12-10
In its Decision No. LET-AT-R-300-2002 dated October 11, 2002, the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) provided the Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) and VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA) with a copy of a report prepared by the Agency's engineer, André Paquette, P. Eng., entitled Draft...
LET-AT-R-339-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-11-22
This letter is a follow-up to a recent telephone call that Mr. Bill Aird, the Agency's Senior Environmental Officer made to your office regarding the environmental assessment (EA) of the above noted project. The Agency requests that you indicate whether your organization has an interest in...
LET-R-280-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-09-27