Browse decisions and determinations
This database contains all public Decisions, Determinations, Orders and certain interim Decisions made by the Canadian Transportation Agency since 1988. Some decisions are confidential and are not published.
Sector
Ruling type
Date
- 2017 1 Apply 2017 filter
- 2016 4 Apply 2016 filter
- 2015 11 Apply 2015 filter
- 2014 7 Apply 2014 filter
- 2013 6 Apply 2013 filter
- 2012 2 Apply 2012 filter
- 2011 2 Apply 2011 filter
- 2010 3 Apply 2010 filter
- 2009 1 Apply 2009 filter
- 2008 2 Apply 2008 filter
- 2006 6 Apply 2006 filter
- 2004 1 Apply 2004 filter
- 2003 2 Apply 2003 filter
- 2002 8 Apply 2002 filter
- 2001 5 Apply 2001 filter
- 2000 5 Apply 2000 filter
- 1999 11 Apply 1999 filter
Showing 51-60 of 77 decisions.
On December 21, 2001 and December 27, 2001 respectively, the Canadian Pacific Railway Company (CP) and the Canadian National Railway Company (CN) filed motions with the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) requesting the dismissal of a running rights application filed with the Agency by the...
LET-R-101-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-04-05
This is in reference to the Ferroequus Railway Company Limited (FE) application dated October 25, 2001 and to motions for dismissal of that application filed by the Canadian Pacific Railway Company (CP) on December 21, 2001 and the Canadian National Railway Company (CN) on December 27, 2001....
LET-R-86-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-03-21
In Decision No. LET-R-1-2002 dated January 4, 2002, the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) acknowledged the filing of a motion by the Canadian Pacific Railway Company (CP) in the above proceeding relating to the request by Ferroequus Railway Company Limited (FE) to run and operate its...
LET-R-35-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-02-01
This is further to Naber Seed and Grain Co. Ltd.'s (Naber) motion of January 8, 2002, wherein Naber is seeking an order from the Agency: i) precluding the Canadian National Railway Company (CN) from naming and/or calling any witnesses after January 11, 2002; ii) allowing Naber's legal...
LET-R-20-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-01-23
This is in reference to the motion dated December 6, 2001, filed by the Canadian National Railway Company (CN) requesting that the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) summarily dismiss the above-noted application for lack of authority under section 138 of the Canada Transportation Act (CTA)....
LET-R-8-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-01-09
This is in reference to the application of the Canadian Pacific Railway Company (CP) dated December 21, 2001 wherein CP requested intervener status and filed preliminary objections with respect to the above-noted application.
CP submits that it has an interest in the proceedings and should be...
LET-R-1-2002 | Letter Decision | 2002-01-04
This is in reference to the above-noted complaint filed by Ferroequus Railway Company Limited (FE) on October 30, 2001. In its application, FE is applying to the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) pursuant to subsections 138(1) and (2) of theCanada Transportation Act (CTA), for an order...
LET-R-443-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-11-09
Reference is made to Trillium Railway Company Limited's solicitors (Trillium) correspondences dated December 27, 2000 and March 5, 2001 and to the City of Welland (the City) response dated March 20, 2001 with respect to the enforcement of Canadian Transportation Agency Order No. 2000-AGR-42.
On...
LET-R-214-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-04-30
This is in reference to the above-noted application filed by the Hudson Bay Railway Company (HBRC) on February 27, 2001. In its application, HBRC requests two Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) orders. First, HBRC asks the Agency for what may be termed a "running rights" order. That is, HBRC...
LET-R-128-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-03-16
This is in reference to the above-noted application filed by the Ferroequus Railway Company Limited (FE) on February 20, 2001. In its application, FE requests three Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) orders. Firstly, FE asks the Agency for what may be termed a "running rights" order. That is,...
LET-R-127-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-03-16