Browse decisions and determinations
This database contains all public Decisions, Determinations, Orders and certain interim Decisions made by the Canadian Transportation Agency since 1988. Some decisions are confidential and are not published.
Ruling type
Date
Showing 1-10 of 27 decisions.
INTRODUCTION
[1] On August 28, 2015, Cambridge, on behalf of itself and Kitchener (applicants), filed the above application with the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) for authority to construct an at‑grade road crossing at mileage 7.40 of CP’s Waterloo Subdivision, and for the apportionment...
389-R-2016 | Decision | 2016-12-30
SUMMARY
[1] The Agency has determined CN’s and CP’s MRE and revenue for the 2015-2016 crop year as set out in Table 1. CN’s and CP’s revenues were both above their MRE and, as such, they are required to pay out the excess revenue and penalty, as set out in Table 1, to the Western Grains Research...
378-R-2016 | Decision | 2016-12-22
SUMMARY
[1] Anne Rector filed an application with the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) pursuant to subsection 172(1) of the CTA concerning difficulties she experienced while making accommodation requests with VIA between 2000 and 2015 and the manner in which she was treated by VIA staff at...
379-AT-R-2016 | Decision | 2016-12-22
Canada Limited, which is a wholly-owned, federally-incorporated subsidiary of G3 Canada Limited (G3), owns an approximately 5.4 mile-long freight railway, known as the McNeill Subdivision, between Burstall and McNeill.
G3 acquired 6970184 Canada Ltd. (6970184), a federal railway company...
376-R-2016 | Decision | 2016-12-21
SUMMARY
[1] The Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) considered whether Louise Bark is a person with a disability for the purposes of Part V of the CTA, and if so, whether the following constitute undue obstacles to her mobility:
VIA’s lack of a formal policy to accommodate the needs of persons...
371-AT-R-2016 | Decision | 2016-12-16
INTRODUCTION
[1] On February 26, 2016, CP filed an application pursuant to subsection 101(3) of the CTA for authority to construct and maintain six utility crossings of the Belle Plaine Spur, where CP will construct its railway line.
[2] CP will cross the SaskEnergy Incorporated’s (SaskEnergy)...
355-R-2016 | Decision | 2016-11-25
Arnaud Railway Company (ARC) is the holder of Certificate of Fitness No. 97002, issued by the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) pursuant to subsection 92(1) of the Canada Transportation Act, S.C., 1996, c. 10, as amended (CTA), which permits ARC to operate a line of railway between...
2016-R-195 | Order | 2016-11-21
SUMMARY
[1] The Agency considered whether, for the purposes of CN’s MRE program, the carriage of grain traffic by CN to Thornton Yard or to VIT or traffic forwarded to the SRY at New Westminster (collectively the “Traffic”) is subject to the MRE.
[2] In making this determination, the Agency...
336-R-2016 | Decision | 2016-11-01
SUMMARY
[1] The Agency considered whether, for the purposes of computing Canadian National Railway Company’s (CN) MRE, the mileage travelled by CN beyond Thornton Yard in Vancouver and Neebing Yard in Thunder Bay should be included in the calculation of its average length of haul (LoH) for the crop...
334-R-2016 | Decision | 2016-10-28
SUMMARY
[1] This decision considers three issues.
[2] The first issue is whether CN breached its level of service obligations with respect to EMI’s traffic. The Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) finds that by not providing service to EMI at either RD-47 or [REDACTED], CN breached those...
CONF-11-2016 | Letter Decision | 2016-08-26