Browse decisions and determinations
This database contains all public Decisions, Determinations, Orders and certain interim Decisions made by the Canadian Transportation Agency since 1988. Some decisions are confidential and are not published.
Ruling type
Date
- 2017 1 Apply 2017 filter
- 2016 2 Apply 2016 filter
- 2013 2 Apply 2013 filter
- 2012 1 Apply 2012 filter
- 2010 1 Apply 2010 filter
- 2008 1 Apply 2008 filter
- 2005 5 Apply 2005 filter
- 2004 7 Apply 2004 filter
- 2003 8 Apply 2003 filter
- 2002 11 Apply 2002 filter
- 2001 10 Apply 2001 filter
- 2000 3 Apply 2000 filter
- 1999 3 Apply 1999 filter
- 1998 6 Apply 1998 filter
Showing 41-50 of 61 decisions.
By Decision No. LET-AT-R-278-2001 dated June 13, 2001, the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) required VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA) to respond to the Agency's Decision No. LET-AT-R-261-2001 dated May 31, 2001, as well as the issues raised in the Council of Canadians with Disabilities' (CCD)...
LET-AT-R-304-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-06-29
April 3, 2001
IN THE MATTER OF an application by the Council of Canadians with Disabilities for Council of Canadians with Disabilities for pursuant to subsections 27(1) and 28(2) of the Canada Transportation Act, S.C. 1996, c. 10, and for a final order pursuant to section 172 of the Canada...
2001-AT-R-122 | Order | 2001-04-03
By letter dated December 4, 2000, the Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) filed an application with the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) for interim relief pursuant to subsections 27(1) and 28(2) of the Canada Transportation Act (CTA), and for a final order pursuant to section 172...
LET-AT-R-176-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-04-03
In order to conduct its inquiry into whether the tariff constitutes an obstacle and, if so, whether the obstacle is undue, the Agency requires information and evidence. In particular, the Agency requires a complete and detailed response from VIA to the issues identified in the Agency Decision No....
LET-AT-R-147-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-03-21
The Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) has received your letter of February 22, 2001 and has carefully considered the submissions made therein. VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA) has argued the position that the Agency does not have the jurisdiction to proceed with the new inquiry with respect to...
LET-AT-R-146-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-03-21
The Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD), by letters dated February 1 and 7, 2001 requests that the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) consider a number of issues which are set out below. CCD's request that the Agency proceed with the issuance of an interim order is addressed in a...
LET-AT-R-82-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-02-22
The Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD), by letters dated February 1 and 7, 2001, requested that the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) proceed to issue an interim order requiring that VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA) not enter into any contracts or commence any work on the Nightstock cars...
LET-AT-R-81-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-02-22
Background
On January 24, 2001, the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) issued Decision No. LET-AT-R-35-2001 concerning the request by the Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) that the Agency issue an interim order against VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA).
By letter dated January 31, 2001,...
LET-AT-R-80-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-02-22
Background
By letter dated December 4, 2000, the Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) filed an application with the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) seeking a final order pursuant to section 172 of the CTA with respect to rolling stock which it understood VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA)...
LET-AT-R-35-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-01-24
April 19, 2000
IN THE MATTER OF Decision No. 641-AT-R-1998 dated December 29, 1998 - VIA Rail Canada Inc.
File No. U3570/98-23
BACKGROUND
In its Decision No. 641-AT-R-1998 dated December 29, 1998, the Canadian Transportation Agency (hereinafter the Agency) made a determination on the application...
280-AT-R-2000 | Decision | 2000-04-19