Decisions and determinations

""

 

This database contains all public Decisions, Determinations, Orders and certain interim Decisions made by the Canadian Transportation Agency since 1988. Some decisions are confidential and are not published.

Browse decisions

Advanced search for decisions

Displaying 22651 - 22660 of 40449
Decision Decision number Decision date
March 16, 2001 IN THE MATTER OF an application by Omni Air Transport Corp. for an exemption from the application of subsection 84(2) of the Canada Transportation Act, S.C., 1996, c. 10. File No. M4211/O96-2 Omni Air Transport Corp. (hereinafter the Licensee) has applied to the Canadian...
2001-A-87 2001-03-16
March 16, 2001 APPLICATION by Korean Air Lines Co. Ltd. for an approval pursuant to section 77 of the Canada Transportation Act, S.C., 1996, c. 10, to operate an additional weekly all-cargo flight between Seoul, Republic of Korea, and Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and for authority pursuant to...
115-A-2001 2001-03-16

Rescission of Decision No. 83-A-2001 - Cubana de Aviacion S.A.

March 16, 2001 APPLICATION by Cubana de Aviacion S.A. pursuant to section 32 of the Canada Transportation Act, S.C., 1996, c. 10, for rescission of Decision No. 83-A-2001 dated February 27, 2001. File No. M4835-C16-1 Docket No. 010232 Cubana de Aviacion S.A. (hereinafter Cubana) has applied to the...
113-A-2001 2001-03-16
March 16, 2001 APPLICATION by Omni Air Transport Corp. pursuant to subsection 73(2) of the Canada Transportation Act, S.C., 1996, c. 10, for a licence to operate a non-scheduled international service to transport traffic on a charter basis between points in the United States of America and points...
116-A-2001 2001-03-16
This is in reference to the above-noted application filed by the Hudson Bay Railway Company (HBRC) on February 27, 2001. In its application, HBRC requests two Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) orders. First, HBRC asks the Agency for what may be termed a "running rights" order. That is, HBRC...
LET-R-128-2001 2001-03-16
This is in reference to the above-noted application filed by the Ferroequus Railway Company Limited (FE) on February 20, 2001. In its application, FE requests three Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) orders. Firstly, FE asks the Agency for what may be termed a "running rights" order. That is,...
LET-R-127-2001 2001-03-16
March 16, 2001 IN THE MATTER OF the Western Grain Revenue Cap established pursuant to Division VI, Part III of the Canada Transportation Act, S.C., 1996, c. 10. File No. T6650-17 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Decision is to inform western grain participants of the Canadian Transportation...
114-R-2001 2001-03-16
March 15, 2001 APPLICATION by Patricia LeBlanc pursuant to subsection 172(1) of the Canada Transportation Act, S.C., 1996, c. 10, concerning the information provided to her by Marine Atlantic Inc. and the facilities and level of service on board the "Max Mols" ferry on her day trip to Newfoundland...
112-AT-W-2001 2001-03-15
March 15, 2001 The suspension is no longer in effect by Order No. 2001-A-143 IN THE MATTER OF the operation of a domestic service and a non-scheduled international service by Commando Air Transport Inc. - Licence Nos. 970090 and 970091. File Nos. M4210/C411-1M4210/C411-2 Under Licence No. 970090...
2001-A-86 2001-03-15

Decision No. 95-R-2000 concerning the Algoma Central Railway Inc. rail operations in Steelton yard, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario and Mr. Eugenio Pagnotta noise complaint

On December 7, 2000 the Federal Court of Appeal ruled that the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) did not, under existing legislation, have the jurisdiction to investigate and determine complaints relating to noise, smoke and vibrations emanating from the day-to-day operations of a federal...
LET-R-123-2001 2001-03-15