Browse decisions and determinations
This database contains all public Decisions, Determinations, Orders and certain interim Decisions made by the Canadian Transportation Agency since 1988. Some decisions are confidential and are not published.
Sector
Ruling type
Date
Showing 11-20 of 20 decisions.
In response to LET-W-47-2001, the production order issued by the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) on February 5, 2001 in the above matter, the Pacific Pilotage Authority (the Authority) filed with the Agency a service contract with subsequent amendments between the Authority and the...
LET-W-138-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-03-19
This is in reference to the above-noted application filed by the Hudson Bay Railway Company (HBRC) on February 27, 2001. In its application, HBRC requests two Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) orders. First, HBRC asks the Agency for what may be termed a "running rights" order. That is, HBRC...
LET-R-128-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-03-16
This is in reference to the above-noted application filed by the Ferroequus Railway Company Limited (FE) on February 20, 2001. In its application, FE requests three Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) orders. Firstly, FE asks the Agency for what may be termed a "running rights" order. That is,...
LET-R-127-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-03-16
On December 7, 2000 the Federal Court of Appeal ruled that the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) did not, under existing legislation, have the jurisdiction to investigate and determine complaints relating to noise, smoke and vibrations emanating from the day-to-day operations of a federal...
LET-R-123-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-03-15
The Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD), by letters dated February 1 and 7, 2001 requests that the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) consider a number of issues which are set out below. CCD's request that the Agency proceed with the issuance of an interim order is addressed in a...
LET-AT-R-82-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-02-22
The Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD), by letters dated February 1 and 7, 2001, requested that the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) proceed to issue an interim order requiring that VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA) not enter into any contracts or commence any work on the Nightstock cars...
LET-AT-R-81-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-02-22
Background
On January 24, 2001, the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) issued Decision No. LET-AT-R-35-2001 concerning the request by the Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) that the Agency issue an interim order against VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA).
By letter dated January 31, 2001,...
LET-AT-R-80-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-02-22
By letter of October 3, 2000, the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) determined that it will proceed with the jurisdictional question of whether obesity is a disability for purposes of the accessibility provisions of the Canada Transportation Act (CTA) as a preliminary issue before making a...
LET-AT-A-46-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-02-02
Background
By letter dated December 4, 2000, the Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) filed an application with the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) seeking a final order pursuant to section 172 of the CTA with respect to rolling stock which it understood VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA)...
LET-AT-R-35-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-01-24
This is further to the attached letter from Air Canada dated November 3, 2000, with which it provided to the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) a copy of the complaint Ms. Ducharme has also filed with the Canadian Human Rights Commission. In addition, Air Canada made a statement in this...
LET-AT-A-12-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-01-11