Notices of Violations issued by CTA's enforcement officers

Statistics

  2025-2026 (year to date) 2024-2025 2023-2024 2022-2023 2021-2022
Notice of Violation – with Administrative Monetary PenaltyNote 1 8 52 75 33 11
Notice of Violation – with Warning Note 2 0 0 0 0 0
Total amount of Administrative Monetary Penalties Note 1 $190,250 $1,586,610 $1,343,430 $725,380 $253,975

List of Notices of Violations

This list below includes Notices of Violations issued by enforcement officers. Learn more about types of enforcement actions and contraventions.

Consistent with statutory provisions and best practices, the Agency undertakes to publish on its website the results of its formal enforcement actions at the time of the issuance of a Notice of Violation. More detailed information can be found in the CTA's Compliance and Enforcement Policy.

Displaying 1 - 10 of 276 actions.
Regulated entity Contravention Date of Issuance Penalty
Unicair GmbH

On or about September 30, 2024, Unicair GmbH operated an international passenger charter, using an aircraft bearing registration D-ATWO from Stephenville, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada (CYJT) to Blackpool, United Kingdom (EGNH), which was not authorized by the terms and conditions to which its licence is subject, thereby contravening subsection 74(2) of the Canada Transportation Act.

2025-05-16 Monetary penalty
$2,250
Porter Airlines (Canada) Limited

(1) On or about September 8, 2024, Porter Airlines (Canada) Limited, at Toronto Pearson International Airport, failed to accept a service dog for transportation and permit the animal to accompany the person on board, on the request of a person with a disability thereby contravening subsection 51(1) of the Accessible Transportation for Persons with Disabilities Regulations.

(2) On or about September 8, 2024, Porter Airlines (Canada) Limited, failed to provide to a person with a disability on flight PD403, any passenger seat adjacent to their passenger seat that is needed to provide sufficient floor space for their service dog, if because of the size of the service dog, the passenger seat of the person with a disability does not provide sufficient floor space for the service dog to lie down at the person’s feet in a manner that ensures the safety and well-being of the dog and the person, thereby contravening subsection 51(4) of the Accessible Transportation for Persons with Disabilities Regulations.

(3) On or about September 8, 2024, Porter Airlines (Canada) Limited, at Toronto Pearson International Airport, refused to transport a person with a disability on flight PD403, and did not show that transporting the person would impose an undue hardship on it, thereby contravening subsection 60(1) of the Accessible Transportation for Persons with Disabilities Regulations.

2025-05-08 Monetary penalty
$120,000
Aer Lingus Limited

(A) On or about February 21, 2025, Aer Lingus Limited advertised the price of an air service on their mobile application without including the name and amount of each tax, fee or charge relating to the air service that is a third party charge, thereby contravening paragraph 28(1)(d) of the Air Passenger Protection Regulations.

(B) On or about February 21, 2025, Aer Lingus Limited advertised the price of an air service on their mobile application and did not set out all third party charges under the heading “Taxes, Fees and Charges”, thereby contravening subsection 28(2) of the Air Passenger Protection Regulations.

(C) On or about April 16, 2025, Aer Lingus Limited advertised the price of an air service on the website aerlingus.com/html/fr-CA/home.html and did not set out all third party charges under the heading “Taxes, Fees and Charges”, thereby contravening subsection 28(2) of the Air Passenger Protection Regulations.

(D) On or about February 21, 2025, Aer Lingus Limited made a reference to an air transportation charge in an advertisement on their mobile application and did not set the charge out under the heading “Air Transportation Charges”, thereby contravening subsection 28(3) of the Air Passenger Protection Regulations.

(E) On or about April 16, 2025, Aer Lingus Limited made a reference to an air transportation charge in an advertisement on the website aerlingus.com/html/fr-CA/home.html and did not set the charge out under the heading “Air Transportation Charges”, thereby contravening subsection 28(3) of the Air Passenger Protection Regulations.

2025-05-01 Monetary penalty
$2,500
Air Canada

(A) On or about June 27, 2024, at Halifax Stanfield International Airport (CYHZ), Air Canada failed to provide the passengers, by means of an audible announcement, the reason for the delay for flight number AC361, thereby contravening subsection 13(4) of the Air Passenger Protection Regulations.

(B) On or about June 27, 2024, Air Canada failed to provide passengers affected by the delay of flight AC361 scheduled to depart on June 27, 2024, the reason for the delay using the available communication method for which they had indicated a preference, including a method that is compatible with adaptive technologies intended to assist persons with disabilities, thereby contravening subsection 13(5) of the Air Passenger Protection Regulations.

2025-04-23 Monetary penalty
$14,500
Flair Airlines Ltd.

On or about December 19, 2024, at Calgary International Airport (YYC), Flair Airlines Ltd. failed to provide the passengers, by means of an audible announcement, the reason for the delay for flight number F82500, thereby contravening subsection 13(4) of the Air Passenger Protection Regulations.

2025-04-10 Monetary penalty
$10,000
China Southern Airlines Company Limited

(A) On or about February 3, 2025, China Southern Airlines Company Limited carrying on business as China Southern Airlines, China Southern advertised the price of an air service on their Facebook page without indicating whether the service is one-way or round-trip, thereby contravening paragraph 28(1)(b) of the Air Passenger Protection Regulations.

(B) On or about December 9, 2024, China Southern Airlines Company Limited carrying on business as China Southern Airlines, China Southern made reference to an air transportation charge in an advertisement on the website www.csair.com/ca/en/ but did not set the charge out under the heading “Air Transportation Charges”, thereby contravening subsection 28(3) of the Air Passenger Protection Regulations.

(C) On or about December 9, 2024, China Southern Airlines Company Limited carrying on business as China Southern Airlines, China Southern provided information in an advertisement on the website www.csair.com/ca/en/ that could interfere with the ability of anyone to readily determine the total price that must be paid for any optional incidental service, thereby contravening section 29 of the Air Passenger Protection Regulations.

2025-04-03 Monetary penalty
$3,500
Flair Airlines Ltd.

On or about January 3, 2025, at Vancouver International Airport, Flair Airlines Ltd. failed to provide assistance services, on the request of a person with a disability and without delay, to assist the person in proceeding to the boarding area after check-in for flight F8856, thereby contravening paragraph 35(d) of the Accessible Transportation for Persons with Disabilities Regulations.

2025-04-01 Monetary penalty
$30,000
Flair Airlines Ltd.

(A) On or about October 2, 2024, Flair Airlines Ltd. failed to make available, in simple, clear and concise language, on a document on which the itinerary of a passenger appears, the terms and conditions referred to in subsection 5(1) of the Air Passenger Protection Regulations (APPR), thereby contravening subsection 5(2) of the APPR.

(B) On or about October 2, 2024, Flair Airlines Ltd. failed to provide, in simple, clear and concise language, on a document on which the itinerary of a passenger appears, information on the treatment of passengers and minimum compensation owed by the carrier and the recourse against the carrier available to passengers, including their recourse to the Agency, thereby contravening subsection 5(3) of the Air Passenger Protection Regulations.

2025-04-01 Monetary penalty
$7,500
Air China Limited

(A) On or about January 31, 2025, Air China Limited advertised the price of an air service originating in Canada on their mobile application without setting out all third party charges under the heading “Taxes, Fees and Charges”, thereby contravening subsection 28(2) of the Air Passenger Protection Regulations.

(B) On or about March 21, 2025, Air China Limited provided information in an advertisement on the website www.airchina.ca and on their mobile application in a manner that could interfere with the ability of anyone to readily determine the total price that must be paid for optional incidental services, thereby contravening section 29 of the Air Passenger Protection Regulations.

2025-03-24 Monetary penalty
$1,000
Saudi Arabian Airlines Corporation

(A) On or about March 4, 2025, Saudi Arabian Airlines Corporation, carrying on business as Saudi Arabian Airlines, set out an air transportation charge in the booking system found on the web site https://www.saudia.com/en-CA as if it were a third party charge, thereby contravening section 30 of the Air Passenger Protection Regulations.

(B) On or about March 20, 2025, Saudi Arabian Airlines Corporation, carrying on business as Saudi Arabian Airlines, set out an air transportation charge in the booking system found on their mobile application as if it were a third party charge, thereby contravening section 30 of the Air Passenger Protection Regulations.

2025-03-20 Monetary penalty
$1,100